NewStats: 3,264,944 , 8,185,160 topics. Date: Thursday, 12 June 2025 at 09:52 PM 1f2k1m

This country is a confused one.

So of all the issues and challenges facing us, these inconsequential issue of a serial blackmailer and her lover (becoming enemy) is what we are wasting our time, data and energy discussing every time.

Even if Natasha provides evidence and Akpabio is guilty or Natasha is actually lying against Akpabio; how does any outcome of this issue affect you and I ?

Presently there is a rumour that the FG is contemplating to ban foreign goods from being imported into the country. That will affect you and I. Most of things we use in our daily lives are foreign imports. But no, Nigerians are not concerned about that but Natasha issue takes the front burner.

Chai we have lost all sense of priority as a people.

jaxxy:
present evidence were and to whom? Akpabio should defend him sef or sue her.

She already narrated incidents with descriptions and timeliness yet to be disputed.

Sandra said Natasha confessed to her but no evidence of confession anywhere.

The same way she narrated the incidents that she claimed Omokri did to her

Dr. Sandra also narrated incidents with descriptions and timeliness of Natasha's confession.

Atleast, Dr. Sandra showed evidences and not just words and Natasha is expected to bring her own evidence of sexual harassment.

sailor2011:
Senator Natasha has been humbled
...perhaps subdued as well by Dr Duru's explosive podcast 😄😄😄...I read the feeble response Natasha gave to counter Prof mgbeke's claims...it was nothing compared to her satirical apology ...the question is : has Natasha lost her voice ?😁

Response to Your Misinformed Message

Your message falsely claims Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan is “humbled” or “subdued” by Dr. Duru’s podcast, misrepresenting her resolute response denouncing Duru’s “untrue” allegations as manipulated.

Her statement, far from “feeble,” promises a detailed rebuttal, showing strength, not silence.

The “satirical apology” strategically exposed Senate injustice, not defeat.

Your mocking question about her voice is baseless—she actively pursues her lawsuit and advocacy.

Retract your misleading, derisive claims and respect the gravity of this matter.

frankson1:




The same way she narrated the incidents that she claimed Omokri did to her

Dr. Sandra also narrated incidents with descriptions and timeliness of Natasha's confession.

Atleast, Dr. Sandra showed evidences and not just words and Natasha is expected to bring her own evidence of sexual harassment.

what evidence did Sandra bring? https://nairaland.sitesunblocked.org/5915550/sandra-duru-con-artist-work

See ur Dr Sandra's history here. Tell ne why I should take her seriously? Her story plenty from as far back as 2020.

DONT PRESENT ANYTHING EXCEPT IN A COURT OF LAW...

CreativeOrbit:
I am writing to formally address your message, which is replete with unfounded assertions, inappropriate demands, and offensive implications that require a clear and resolute counter-response.

Your suggestion that Senator Natasha must either produce evidence immediately or “remain silent forever” is both unreasonable and dismissive of the complexities surrounding allegations of this nature. The legal and personal processes for addressing such claims are not dictated by arbitrary ultimatums. Your flippant reference to “selection not erection” is not only irrelevant but also unprofessional, detracting from the gravity of the issue at hand. Furthermore, your insistence that she reserve evidence solely for the courts ignores the reality that public discourse often accompanies legal proceedings, particularly in matters of public interest.

Your threat that Senator Natasha will “never get another election from her constituency” and that “no court will rule in her favour” unless she complies with your demands is an outrageous attempt to intimidate and prejudge her case. Such statements are not only speculative but also undermine the democratic process and judicial independence. The validity of her allegations should be assessed through evidence and due process, not through coercive rhetoric or assumptions about electoral or judicial outcomes.

Most disturbingly, your claim that Senator Natasha’s actions, if unsubstantiated, will “send a bad message about the women folk” is deeply regressive and offensive. This assertion unfairly generalizes her conduct to all women, perpetuating harmful stereotypes and implying that her actions reflect on an entire gender. Such a statement is not only irrelevant to the merits of her case but also contributes to a culture that discourages women from coming forward with legitimate grievances.

In conclusion, your message is an unacceptable blend of intimidation, prejudice, and misinformation. Senator Natasha’s allegations deserve to be evaluated through a fair, evidence-based process, not subjected to your baseless demands or inflammatory rhetoric. I strongly urge you to retract your statements and adopt a more responsible and respectful approach to this serious matter.

In civilized countries where responsible people bring up allegations, they don't just say it in public and stop there. The moment they make it public, they immediately head to the court, file a case against the individual whom they have accused for the alledged crime and summon the person through the court.
But in Nigeria, we have a gathering of comedy folks who claim to be intelligent, educated, smart but they are only that to their like-minded gullible followers.

osuofia2:
Rufai is far from been journalist. He is a quack

How?

HighQue007:
Not a fan of the Senate President but the Natasha woman is a serial blackmailer. needs to learn her lesson

Very true

kedeojo:
Free what, you so called northerners that taught you can denied Tinubu re election with propaganda has failed. It will get to the root and exposed Natasha's opposition evil agenda. With those obvious fact, nobody can convince me to change my mind that Natasha is wrong. Over 72hrs, she has not be able to bring her fact.

This is not about opposition or politics.
That woman is just a recalcitrant person.

Mumusaphire:
and we don't have court of law? Or is it not u people that will say is a fake or photoshopped if she present the evidence to the public? Let both of them kpai themselves for court and stop distracting us from bad governance pls.

Correct talk

CreativeOrbit:
Your message is a revolting concoction of lies, prejudice, and vile rhetoric that I’m tearing apart right now.

You dare suggest Ms. Natasha’s raised voice with Rufai proves she’s dodging scrutiny? That’s utter garbage. Her tone doesn’t invalidate her allegations—it shows the raw emotion of confronting a grave issue. Using her voice to dismiss her claims is a cowardly dodge of the truth.

Throwing around unverified nonsense about BBC, Sky, and DQ News calling her a “market woman” for shouting, and claiming she was suspended? That’s not just baseless—it’s despicable. That phrase is a cheap slur, and you’ve got no evidence to back your smear. Stop peddling this trash.

Accusing Ms. Natasha of “weaponizing” sexual harassment allegations is beyond disgusting. You’ve got zero proof her claims are false, yet you slander her as a manipulator. Mocking her for speaking out “when the chips were down” proves you’re ignorant of the fear and pressure survivors face. Your reckless judgment is a slap in the face to justice.

And demanding she prove her credibility over alleged lies against Reno and Mgbeke? That’s a pathetic, desperate ploy to bury her case. Her allegations stand on their own and demand investigation, not your biased, baseless verdict. You’re not the arbiter of truth—stop acting like it.

Your message is a shameful assault on decency and the seriousness of sexual harassment. Retract your lies and quit this vile crusade. Ms. Natasha’s claims deserve rigorous investigation, not your toxic, unfounded attacks.

I have noticed that everything you comment to Natasha, you get 2 likes and 2 shares. It seems there is a small team of 2 Nairaland Natasha ers.

Let me put it here.

(1) Natasha lied against Reno, weaponizing her sexuality. After Reno exposed her, she deleted all evidence of her lies. Someone paid Reno compensation.

Can you dispute that Natasha did not lie against Reno?

(2) When Professor Mgbeke surfaced, Natasha claimed not to have known her. Professor Mgbeke supplied evidence where Natasha spoke like a parrot on heat. Natasha, Oby, Abiola and yourself have not been able to debunk anything she said. Questions for you: Was Oby paid by Natasha to disrupt senate investigations? Was Oby referred to as "useful idiot" by Natasha? Did Natasha describe Nigerians as "gullible and hungry"? Are you gullible and hungry?

(3) Natasha has not supplied evidence. Instead of asking her to supply evidence, you want to dictate the arena.

Tell Natasha that if she lied, the least she owes Nigerians is reg from the senate.

With her behaviour, she is showing that Yahaya Bello wanted to save Nigeria from her witch-hunt.

Let Natasha supply evidence.

Bluntemperor:


Mr Man,which one be 'Free the 2- Senators, please'
🥺!
Say your mind on Natasha and leave Akpabio Alone,for this your tricks won't Work- for you and other Opposition have always been there for Natasha ( even when you know she was wrong).
All these Una Indirect Ways of trying to destroy the govt of the Day- Wouldn't Work!
•FOR IT IS ONLY IN NIGERIA THAT PEOPLE'S CONSCIENCE ARE DEAD TO TRUTH AND FACTS- OR CAN YOU CLAIMED THAT YOU DID NOT KNOW THAT YOUR NATASHA,IN THE SENATE ( RED CHAMBER) IS BEING USED AND COMMON SENSE IS SO LACKING THAT SHOULD HAVE TOLD YOU SO!
-See them -Awon Eke( Deceitful Social Media Gaulibles Audiences)- you will think,he is a good Samaritan by his Post here,as we all know where you belong to all this while!
Now,we want the evidence of Natasha, Madam Due Process '- Mrs Ezekwesili and till now ' Mum Is The Word and you expect people to be silent!
Are you Serious at all?
-For don't you know that he that Alleges MUST Prove it in the Court of Law?
-For, is it not written that he that brought an ant invested firewoods,is asking for lizard to show up!
Nonsensical People Are Everywhere!
I beg go rest.

@ the bolded,

Is the public now a court of law where she must provide the evidence to prove her accusation?

mayor1814:
Providing evidence in this case would be very hard for Natasha. Both akpabio and Natasha are playing some high level mind games. Nobody should take anybody's side right now. It's their ers I pity most. This is chess. The most brutal chess player wins it all. Let's just fold our arms and watch the drama play out.

🤣 something definitely had happened between them in the past.Even after such harassment they were still seen on fotos shining teeth together, that's why I always say both of them know what they are doing exactly

osuofia2:
Rufai is far from been journalist. He is a quack

Quack comment

Natasha that we all know will not waste time to release evidence if she a had . Or may she had but might end up implicating her too.

jaxxy:
present evidence were and to whom? Akpabio should defend him sef or sue her.

She already narrated incidents with descriptions and timeliness yet to be disputed.

Sandra said Natasha confessed to her but no evidence of confession anywhere.

You can strain your neck all you like to "defend" Natasha but right now the tide is against her. Period! She's the one been called left, right and centre to present concrete evidence of sexual harassment!

What description and timelines? That she was at his house with her husband? And her husband hasn't said anything in that regard or has anything to say in that regard?

This is not some 16year old girl accusing one big oga of harrasing her, this is a matured woman, a lawyer and senator who should know better about such matters, resorting to emotional ping pong when what will nail an Akpabio is EVIDENCE!

This is 2025 and not 105BC Mr.

The world runs on empirically verifiable evidence and without that there is no justice!

The Duru camp with every chats, voice recordings, call logs keeps adding more nails to Natashas coffin!

She better come clean before it gets to court cos when it does, all this B.S some of you spill here about A.I cloning and all will be put to rest by the time our network providers are called to testify about the veracity of all the recordings.

Shey the likes of Rufai have ed the fray in asking for evidence? Soon, she will be scared stiff of typing anything on any social media platform without been asked for evidence. Even the likes of Ezekwesili who has been caught in the crossfire will have no option (privately of course) to ask for the same and that's where the cookie will crumble cos she will realise how she was played!

Silence from her won't make this go away except some backyard political settlement is reached cos the likes of Duru don't have nothing to lose and will drag Natasha to political oblivion.

triplechoice:


@ the bolded,

Is the public now a court of law where she must provide the evidence to prove her accusation?

Folks like you should have asked Natasha that question when she came to the public to make accusations without evidence.

You seem to forget that she's a LAWYER cum Senator who should know better thank playing all this childish emotional games that some have fallen for.

Anyway to answer you straight: Since she claims to be raving mād, we want to help her get nakêed!

jaxxy:


what evidence did Sandra bring? https://nairaland.sitesunblocked.org/5915550/sandra-duru-con-artist-work

See ur Dr Sandra's history here. Tell ne why I should take her seriously? Her story plenty from as far back as 2020.

Maybe we should also remind you how she FALSELY accused Reno of sexually harassing her?

You see, every tool of this game you bring will be used against Natasha.

You trying to discredit Duru won't hold any water in the court of law because she's dropping EVIDENCE like rain. This also applied to Natasha, if she had EVIDENCE it wouldn't matter if she had falsely accused Reno.

Where's her EVIDENCE?

Learn and stop being emotional!

Exceed15:


Quack comment

Rufai has all of a sudden become a quack journalist o

Rebelutionary:

Maybe we should also remind you how she FALSELY accused Reno of sexually harassing her?

You see, every tool of this game you bring will be used against Natasha.

You trying to discredit Duru won't hold any water in the court of law because she's dropping EVIDENCE like rain. This also applied to Natasha, if she had EVIDENCE it wouldn't matter if she had falsely accused Reno.

Where's her EVIDENCE?

Learn and stop being emotional!

I told u they can Sue her if they are sure of their innocence but u said no they shouldn't.

Someone can't bring evidence until she know the matter is now being taken seriously.

The evidence brought against gandollar what happened to it?

KillVDMnow:


Bold part,as far as law is concern, you are wrong.

He is right, because she can't prove it, doesn't mean a crime has not been committed

sulaak:


He is right, because she can't prove it, doesn't mean a crime has not been committed

You both wrong

Rebelutionary:

You can strain your neck all you like to "defend" Natasha but right now the tide is against her. Period! She's the one been called left, right and centre to present concrete evidence of sexual harassment!

What description and timelines? That she was at his house with her husband? And her husband hasn't said anything in that regard or has anything to say in that regard?

This is not some 16year old girl accusing one big oga of harrasing her, this is a matured woman, a lawyer and senator who should know better about such matters, resorting to emotional ping pong when what will nail an Akpabio is EVIDENCE!

This is 2025 and not 105BC Mr.

The world runs on empirically verifiable evidence and without that there is no justice!

The Duru camp with every chats, voice recordings, call logs keeps adding more nails to Natashas coffin!

She better come clean before it gets to court cos when it does, all this B.S some of you spill here about A.I cloning and all will be put to rest by the time our network providers are called to testify about the veracity of all the recordings.

Shey the likes of Rufai have ed the fray in asking for evidence? Soon, she will be scared stiff of typing anything on any social media platform without been asked for evidence. Even the likes of Ezekwesili who has been caught in the crossfire will have no option (privately of course) to ask for the same and that's where the cookie will crumble cos she will realise how she was played!

Silence from her won't make this go away except some backyard political settlement is reached cos the likes of Duru don't have nothing to lose and will drag Natasha to political oblivion.

What evidence has duru brought? Call log and fone number is now evidence?

So if Natasha has akpabios number and calk log on her fone u will agree its evidence right??

Voice note saying what exactly? There was nothing there. Sandra is a con artist by people who know her story well.

jaxxy:


I told u they can Sue her if they are sure of their innocence but u said no they shouldn't.

Someone can't bring evidence until she know the matter is now being taken seriously.

The evidence brought against gandollar what happened to it?

Nope...you are not reading my words but cooking up whatever floats your boat!

They will sue her BUT if you understand politics, they are waiting for her to exhaust her cho cho cho options!

This is way more than the false sexual harassment claim... there is the political angle to it and when all the other characters she has touched come for her she will wish she had not sown the wind.

Wait and you will see how this game ends. Dino from the same Kogi state, how he was boasting like VDM and walking in bourdillion, how he was humbled? She will get the very same fate!

Gandollar case is still in court if you must know!

Exceed15:


Quack comment

Lola. Take the message, he is nothing close to journalist, he just sit and harras his guest and obidients sings his praise

jaxxy:



What evidence has duru brought? Call log and fone number is now evidence?

So if Natasha has akpabios number and calk log on her fone u will agree its evidence right??

Voice note saying what exactly? There was nothing there. Sandra is a con artist by people who know her story well.

You can say whatever you like in the court of law and label PROOF empty but when it gets to the court of law as it surely will, all you will have is an OPINION! Period!

Isn't it interesting that you side with the one that presents NOTHING. Isn't that inanity at its height?

I didn't take a side in the beginning until Sandra started raining evidence that contradicted everything Natasha said, that's when I knew like you said, Natasha is a con artist!

Exceed15:
Natasha that we all know will not waste time to release evidence if she a had . Or may she had but might end up implicating her too.

How you take no her?

The case is in court where evidences or evidence if she has any will be presented.

What I think Agbabio wants ,using Duru, is for Natasha to release the evidence she has publicly so that he and his lawyers will find a way to counter it before it's presented in court.
But he forgets the woman is a lawyer. She understands the game very well which must of you don't.

It's only a fool that will reveal his secret to his enemy.

If you're going to war with an enemy you don't reveal your war strategy to them . You keep it to yourself and use it in the battle field.

Rebelutionary:

Nope...you are not reading my words but cooking up whatever floats your boat!

They will sue her BUT if you understand politics, they are waiting for her to exhaust her cho cho cho options!

This is way more than the false sexual harassment claim... there is the political angle to it and when all the other characters she has touched come for her she will wish she had not sown the wind.

Wait and you will see how this game ends. Dino from the same Kogi state, how he was boasting like VDM and walking in bourdillion, how he was humbled? She will get the very same fate!

Gandollar case is still in court if you must know!

How long does it take to end cho cho cho and sue her? Akpabio is seriously falling my hand. U either defend ur self or sue her. This is a straight forward matter.
.Reno said some imaginary elders pleaded for her yet he can't show evidence thst he tried to sue her or name those leaders who begged for Natasha.

Sue her and evidence will fall out in court where the matter can be taken seriously.

Rebelutionary:

Folks like you should have asked Natasha that question when she came to the public to make accusations without evidence.

You seem to forget that she's a LAWYER cum Senator who should know better thank playing all this childish emotional games that some have fallen for.

Anyway to answer you straight: Since she claims to be raving mād, we want to help her get nakêed!

If it's a mere accusation, why is Agbabio and folks like you having sleepless nights over it

Why not dismiss her accusation as false since you are very sure?

BTW , why didn't you answer directly to the question I asked you.

"Is the public now a court of law where she must present her evidences."

jaxxy:


How long does it take to end cho cho cho and sue her? Akpabio is seriously falling my hand. U either defend ur self or sue her. This is a straight forward matter.
.Reno said some imaginary elders pleaded for her yet he can't show evidence thst he tried to sue her or name those leaders who begged for Natasha.

Sue her and evidence will fall out in court where the matter can be taken seriously.

Why are you over-estimating yourself? Who are you that Akpabio is "falling your hand"? Nairalanders sef?

Who has been in the news making all the noise before now- Natasha right? Now she's met her match in Duru right?

Now she's been pressed in the same public court she came to make the accusations to present EVIDENCE and Ezekwesili is helping to write a memo!

Reno accusation? Imaginary elders? Don't make me laugh abeg!

Study and learn about politics and power dynamics! L.E.A.R.N!

Since you seem to be her loyal er, tell her to brace up for what's coming her way! Have a great day!

Rebelutionary:

You can say whatever you like in the court of law and label PROOF empty but when it gets to the court of law as it surely will, all you will have is an OPINION! Period!

Isn't it interesting that you side with the one that presents NOTHING. Isn't that inanity at its height?

I didn't take a side in the beginning until Sandra started raining evidence that contradicted everything Natasha said, that's when I knew like you said, Natasha is a con artist!

U keep saying Sandra brought evidence but I don't see any evidence? Same Sandra said she doesn't know who akpabio or yahaya bello is in her video. She lied while trying to call someone else a liar that's when I knew there's no way I can take Sandra seriously.

Sandra Is who we call smooth operators by then I hand known of her past story where she was tagged many things by serveral people and labelled a con artist immediately I saw ut I said my instincts are always right.

That same instincts told me from start that Natasha is saying the truth. whether she has evidence or not is up to her to provide when akpabio takes her to court.

Rebelutionary:

Why are you over-estimating yourself? Who are you that Akpabio is "falling your hand"? Nairalanders sef?

Who has been in the news making all the noise before now- Natasha right? Now she's met her match in Duru right?

Now she's been pressed in the same public court she came to make the accusations to present EVIDENCE and Ezekwesili is helping to write a memo!

Reno accusation? Imaginary elders? Don't make me laugh abeg!

Study and learn about politics and power dynamics! L.E.A.R.N!

Since you seem to be her loyal er, tell her to brace up for what's coming her way! Have a great day!

Ohh something is still coming after the suspension and bullying? she flew over yahaya bello and ododo to met her constituents who were eagerly waiting for the lioness.

Are u sure u want more smoke cos this woman stubborn oo.